swarm-board V0.2static demo

CCT Summarizer · Eval summary loading

Three summary formats, each fine-tuned or compared against its own reference. base ours / best ours v2 reference

Stage 1 · Prose v1

V0.1 per-message labels — 5 fields per message

—

per-field agreement with Claude Opus labels · Qwen3-30B-A3B

Stage 2 · Prose v2

V0.1.B hierarchical merge — hourly bullets merged up

0.94

F1 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 merges · Qwen3-235B merger

Qwen3-235B0.94
Qwen3-8B0.76
Llama-3.1-8B0.59
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B (untuned; also a LoRA teacher)0.93
reference1.00

Lenient F1 (bullets in the Haiku merge or backed by their own sources), mean over row-4h, row-day, col-1h, col-4h; judge Claude Sonnet 4.5 (same vendor as the reference). Same nodes for every merger.

State graph · v0.3 lean

Qwen3-30B-A3B LoRA · trained on Nebius TF, served on Modal H100 · 131 held-out turns

—

touched-task agreement with Haiku labels · LoRA v2

Cost vs accuracy

Stage 2 + state graph — agreement with the frontier reference vs USD per 1k units (log)

Training

LoRA v2 on Nebius Token Factory: ~22 min (1908 rows, 2 epochs) · v1: 1 epoch, superseded

Metered inference on record

—

Reference (Claude labels and merges)

Stage 1: Claude Opus 5.5 labels (1000 messages) · Stage 2: Claude Haiku 4.5 merges · State graph: Claude Haiku 4.5 labels